Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||edited by Jeffrey L. Jordan and Aaron T. Wolf.|
|Contributions||Jordan, Jeffrey L., Wolf, Aaron T.|
|LC Classifications||HD1695.S65 I58 2006|
|The Physical Object|
|LC Control Number||2005058506|
This comprehensive case study of the “Tri-State Water Wars” from to —centering on the shared waters of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama—presents critical lessons learned about the process of making water allocation decisions across political boundaries. Though the three states failed to reach a settlement in their negotiations to allocate water from the two major southeast river basins—the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF) and the Alabama Price: $ Edited by Jeffrey L. Jordan and Aaron T. Wolf. Share: This comprehensive case study of the "Tri-State Water Wars" from to centering on the shared waters of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama--presents critical lessons learned about the process of making water allocation decisions across political boundaries. Book: Interstate water allocation in Alabama, Florida and Georgia: new issues, new methods, new models + pp. Abstract: This book contains 11 chapters divided into 3 sections providing information on the process of allocating water when it crosses political boundaries, as it occurs in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee Cited by: 5. E-Book Review and Description: This whole case analysis of the “Tri-State Water Wars” from to —centering on the shared waters of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama—presents necessary courses found in regards to the course of of making water allocation choices all through political boundaries.
ISBN This collection of essays examines ongoing “water wars” between Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The three states have been at odds over water allocations in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River Basin since the early : James Newman. Create a new account. Are you an ASCE Member? We recommend that you register using the same email address you use to maintain your ASCE Member account. Advocating for the Long-Term Health of Two Major River Basins. For decades, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida have been battling over the future allocation of water in two major river basins that cross their borders: Georgia and Alabama have been fighting over the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa basin, and all three states are in conflict over the Apalachicola . Tri-State Water Wars — Background and History. Posted in: Natural Resources. Communities in metro Atlanta lie at the headwaters of two river basins that are shared by Georgia, Florida, and Alabama—the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River Basin and the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Basin.
Presents a comprehensive case study of the ""Tri-State Water Wars"" from to - centering on the shared waters of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. This book provides critical lessons learned about the process of making water allocation decisions . The tri-state water dispute is a 21st-century water-use conflict among the states of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida over flows in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin and the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has regulated water flow for the entire Chattahoochee. OWR provides technical support to the state's legal team in the ongoing litigation involving the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the states of Alabama, Florida and Georgia. The division also participates in negotiations regarding water allocation formulas that will prescribe how these interstate water resources will be shared. Contact. This article examines the interstate water controversy between Florida, Georgia, and Alabama regarding allocation of water in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin (ACF). The three states have been unable after 20 years of negotiation to resolve conflicts between urbanization in Atlanta, commercial uses in Alabama, Cited by: 5.